Hebrew word · H2179
זָנַב
vayzanev
to cut off the tail
A verb built from the noun zanav, "tail". In the Piel stem (a verb pattern that often expresses intensive or repeated action) it means "to deal with the tail": attack the rear, cut off the hindmost.
Appears 2 times in 2 verses of the Hebrew Old Testament. ·
What it means
1) to cut off
1a) (Piel) to attack the rear, smite the tail
Abridged from Brown, Driver and Briggs, A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament (1906), via STEPBible.org (CC BY 4.0).
In depth
From the study of Deuteronomy 25:18
- Range of meaning
A verb built from the noun zanav, "tail". In the Piel stem (a verb pattern that often expresses intensive or repeated action) it means "to deal with the tail": attack the rear, cut off the hindmost. It occurs only twice in the Hebrew Bible, here and in Joshua 10:19 ("attack their rear", of chasing a fleeing army).
- Against the English
KJV and WEB use "smote/struck the hindmost/rearmost". BSB says "attacked all your stragglers". These get the sense across but lose the animal picture of the Hebrew. Some modern versions keep the image with "cut off your tail".
- Used elsewhere in the period
The Septuagint renders it ἔκοψέν σου τὴν οὐραγίαν, "cut off your rear-guard/tail of the column". Ouragia was the ordinary military word for the rear of a marching army. The Joshua 10:19 parallel shows it was a recognised military expression.
From the study of Joshua 10:19
- Range of meaning
A verb formed from the noun זָנָב, 'tail'. In the piel (intensive) form it means 'to deal with the tail', that is, to attack the rear of a marching or fleeing group and cut off the stragglers. It appears only twice in the Hebrew Bible: here and Deuteronomy 25:18.
- Against the English
KJV 'smite the hindmost', BSB 'attack them from behind', WEB 'attack them from the rear', ESV 'attack their rear guard'. All catch the idea of the back of the column. 'Rear guard' may suggest an organised unit protecting a retreat, while the Hebrew picture is simply the 'tail' of a fleeing crowd, the slowest and most exposed. YLT's 'ye have smitten' turns a command into a past event.
- Used elsewhere in the period
Deuteronomy 25:18 uses it of Amalek, who 'cut off at your tail all the stragglers behind you' when Israel was 'faint and weary' after leaving Egypt. Israel remembered this as a cowardly, merciless tactic. The Greek Septuagint renders the idea with language about overtaking the enemy's rear (Greek οὐραγία, 'rear of a column'). The Vulgate has the hindmost of the fugitives cut down.
Where it appears
Deuteronomy · 1
-
Deuteronomy 25:18 וַיְזַנֵּ֤ב and it attacked in [the] rear
how they met you on your journey when you were tired and weary, and they attacked all your stragglers; they had no fear of God.
Here: A verb made from the noun zanav, "tail": literally "he tailed you", meaning he struck at the tail end of the column. It appears only here and in Joshua 10:19. The picture is of a predator picking off the back of a herd.
Joshua · 1
-
Joshua 10:19 וְזִנַּבְתֶּ֖ם and you will attack in [the] rear
But you, do not stop there. Pursue your enemies and attack them from behind. Do not let them reach their cities, for the LORD your God has delivered them into your hand.”
Here: A verb formed from the noun 'tail': 'and you shall tail them', meaning cut down the end of the fleeing column, the stragglers and slowest troops. The grammar continues the command ('and strike their rear'). It does not describe something already done, despite YLT's 'ye have smitten'.
Word data: STEPBible.org (CC BY 4.0), main text only.