Why do scholars attribute Jesus' claims to divinity to the Gospel writers rather than to the historical Jesus?

Studied by claude-opus-5-5 · asked once

Many critical scholars think so because Jesus' most explicit claims to divinity are found mainly in John, the latest Gospel, while the earliest Gospel, Mark, shows Jesus speaking about God's kingdom far more than about himself. The Gospels also say openly that the disciples understood things after the resurrection. Other scholars disagree. They point to the authority Jesus claims in Mark and to letters from Paul, written within about 20 to 25 years of Jesus' death, that already treat him as divine.

What the text says

The pattern scholars notice. In John, Jesus speaks openly about who he is: "I and the Father are one" (John 10:30), "before Abraham was born, I am" (John 8:58), and Thomas says to him "My Lord and my God" (John 20:28). Matthew, Mark and Luke (the Synoptic Gospels) contain none of these sayings. In Mark, which most scholars date to around AD 70, Jesus mostly preaches "the kingdom of God" (Mark 1:15). He often tells people to keep quiet about him (Mark 8:29-30) and refers to himself indirectly as "the Son of Man." John is usually dated to around AD 90-100. So the most explicit claims show up in the latest source. Historians usually treat that pattern as a sign that a tradition grew over time.

The Gospels say they are interpreting. The writers state their purpose plainly: "these are written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God" (John 20:31). Luke says he compiled and arranged earlier accounts (Luke 1:1-4). John also says more than once that the disciples understood Jesus' words only "after He was raised from the dead" (John 2:22; John 12:16). He says the Spirit would "remind" them and "guide" them into further truth (John 14:26; John 16:12-13). Critical scholars take these as the Gospels' own admission that what they report has been understood in the light of later faith. Ancient historians also commonly wrote speeches for their characters, which is another reason scholars are careful with long discourses.

Criteria historians apply. Scholars weigh sayings by tests such as:

Multiple attestation: whether a saying appears in independent sources.
Embarrassment: whether it is something a believing writer would hardly have invented.

Some sayings that pass these tests suggest limits on Jesus. "Why do you call Me good? No one is good except God alone" (Mark 10:18) and "not even the Son" knows the day or hour (Mark 13:32) are examples. Matthew softens the first one (Matthew 19:17), which suggests later writers felt uneasy with it.

The evidence on the other side. Even Mark shows Jesus doing things that onlookers say only God can do. He forgives sins, and the scribes ask, "Who can forgive sins but God alone?" (Mark 2:7). He claims authority over the Sabbath (Mark 2:28). At his trial he answers "I am" and says he will be seen as the Son of Man of Daniel 7:13, "sitting at the right hand of Power," and is condemned for blasphemy (Mark 14:61-64). Paul's letters were written in the 50s, before any of the Gospels. They already apply the Jewish confession of the one God to Jesus (1 Corinthians 8:6). They quote what may be an earlier hymn about Christ "existing in the form of God" (Philippians 2:6-11). They also preserve an Aramaic prayer addressed to him, Maranatha, "Come, Lord" (1 Corinthians 16:22). Many scholars think this shows that devotion to Jesus as divine began very early. On that view, it did not develop gradually over decades.

The honest picture. The question assumes a single scholarly verdict, but there isn't one. Most critical scholars agree that the explicit "I am God" style of statement (which no Gospel actually puts in those words) reflects the Gospel writers' interpretation, especially John's. They disagree sharply about whether the historical Jesus made implicit claims to a unique, God-like authority. They also disagree about how quickly his followers came to worship him.

Where readers differ

Developmental view: divinity is a later interpretation

Jesus was a Jewish teacher who announced God's coming kingdom, and perhaps saw himself as a prophet or as Messiah, which means God's anointed king, not God. Belief in his divinity grew after the resurrection experiences, first as God exalting him to heaven and later as his pre-existence. The growth can be traced from Mark to Matthew and Luke to John. Sayings that limit Jesus (Mark 10:18; Mark 13:32) are more likely to be historical than the high-claim discourses found only in John.

Mark 1:15 Mark 10:18 Mark 13:32 Romans 1:3 Acts 2:36 John 8:58 John 20:31

Implicit-to-explicit view: Jesus acted with divine authority, and the Gospels spelled it out

The historical Jesus did not go around saying 'I am God.' But he did act in God's place: he forgave sins, put his own word alongside the Torah ('but I say to you'), claimed the Danielic Son of Man role, and called God 'Abba' in a distinctive way. The Gospel writers, and John most of all, put into explicit words what was implicit in his conduct. This view rests on material that passes the historians' criteria in Mark and in the sayings shared by Matthew and Luke.

Mark 2:5 Mark 14:61 Matthew 5:21 Matthew 11:27 Luke 10:22 Daniel 7:13 Mark 14:36

Early high Christology view: worship of Jesus began at once and goes back to Jesus himself

Paul's letters were written within about two decades of the crucifixion. They already include Jesus within the identity of Israel's one God (1 Corinthians 8:6 reworks the Shema), apply passages about YHWH to him (Philippians 2:10-11 echoes Isaiah 45:23), and preserve Aramaic prayer to him (1 Corinthians 16:22). Devout Jewish monotheists are unlikely to have arrived at this so quickly unless Jesus himself had given grounds for it. On this view John's discourses are interpreted memory, not invention.

1 Corinthians 8:6 Philippians 2:6 Isaiah 45:23 1 Corinthians 16:22 John 20:28 Mark 6:50

Traditional view: the Gospels faithfully report Jesus' own claims

The Gospels claim to rest on eyewitness testimony (Luke 1:2; John 19:35; John 21:24). Differences between John and the Synoptics come from differences in audience, setting and selection, such as private teaching versus public preaching and Jerusalem versus Galilee. They do not come from invention. The charge of blasphemy and the crucifixion itself are best explained if Jesus really did make claims about himself that his opponents found outrageous (John 10:33).

Luke 1:1 John 19:35 John 21:24 John 10:33 Mark 14:64

The words it turns on

ἐγώ egō eimi (ἐγώ εἰμι)

'I am.' Usually an ordinary self-identification: 'It's me' or 'I am he.' In some contexts it echoes how God names himself in the Greek Old Testament (Exodus 3:14; Isaiah 43:10).

Drift: English readers often take every 'I am' as a claim to be God. Only some uses carry that echo clearly (John 8:58; possibly Mark 6:50 and Mark 14:62). Elsewhere it simply means 'it is I.' Luke 21:8 uses the same words for false claimants: 'I am He.'
υἱός huios (υἱός), in 'Son of God'

'Son.' In Jewish usage 'son of God' could mean Israel's king (Psalm 2:7; 2 Samuel 7:14), Israel itself (Exodus 4:22), or Adam (Luke 3:38). It marked a special relationship with God or a role given by God.

Drift: Later creeds gave 'Son of God' the full meaning of divine sonship. Historians ask whether a first-century hearer would have heard that meaning, or the meaning of royal Messiah.
Χριστός Christos (Χριστός) / mashiach (מָשִׁיחַ)

'Anointed one': the expected king from David's line, a human figure.

Drift: 'Christ' is now read almost as Jesus' surname, or as a word meaning 'divine.' Originally, to claim to be Messiah was not to claim to be God.
κύριος kyrios (κύριος)

Ranges from 'sir' and 'master' to the Greek stand-in for God's name, YHWH, in the Septuagint.

Drift: The single English word 'Lord' hides this range. 'Lord' addressed to Jesus during his ministry may simply mean 'sir.' After Easter it often carries the YHWH meaning (Philippians 2:11).
ἄνθρωπος ho huios tou anthrōpou (ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου)

'The son of man.' It can mean 'a human being' or 'I.' It also points to the heavenly figure given everlasting dominion in Daniel 7:13 (Aramaic bar enash).

Drift: Readers often take it to stress Jesus' humanity as opposed to 'Son of God.' In passages like Mark 14:62 it is arguably the higher claim of the two.
θεός theos (θεός)

'God' or 'god.' Applied directly to Jesus in only a few New Testament places (John 1:1; John 20:28; probably Titus 2:13).

Drift: None of these direct uses comes from Jesus himself. That fact is central to the scholarly debate.

What the Bible doesn't say

Jesus wrote nothing that survives, so every word attributed to him comes to us through his followers. The Gospels do not explain how they gathered or shaped his sayings beyond Luke's short preface. In none of them does Jesus say "I am God" in those words. On the other side, the texts give no support to the idea that his divinity was invented centuries later: worship of Jesus is already present in Paul's letters. How much of the high claim goes back to Jesus himself is a judgment historians make from probability. The text does not settle it outright, and believing and secular scholars weigh the same evidence differently.

Key verses

John 8:58
“Truly, truly, I tell you,” Jesus declared, “before Abraham was born, I am!”

The most explicit claim of divinity, and it is found only in the latest Gospel.
Mark 14:61
But Jesus remained silent and made no reply. Again the high priest questioned Him, “Are You the Christ, the Son of the Blessed One?”

In the earliest Gospel, Jesus answers 'I am,' invokes Daniel's Son of Man, and is condemned for blasphemy.
Mark 2:7
“Why does this man speak like this? He is blaspheming! Who can forgive sins but God alone?”

Even in Mark, onlookers say Jesus is doing what only God does.
John 20:31
But these are written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in His name.

John openly says he wrote to produce faith that Jesus is the Son of God.
John 2:22
After He was raised from the dead, His disciples remembered that He had said this. Then they believed the Scripture and the word that Jesus had spoken.

The Gospel itself says the disciples understood Jesus' words only after the resurrection.
Mark 10:18
“Why do you call Me good?” Jesus replied. “No one is good except God alone.

'Why do you call Me good?' is a saying that seems to limit Jesus, which the criterion of embarrassment favours as historical.
Mark 13:32
No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.

'Not even the Son' knows the hour, another saying that admits a limit.
1 Corinthians 8:6
yet for us there is but one God, the Father, from whom all things came and for whom we exist. And there is but one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things came and through whom we exist.

Within about 25 years, Paul applies the Shema's 'one God, one Lord' to the Father and Jesus.
Philippians 2:6
Who, existing in the form of God, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped,

A very early, possibly pre-Pauline hymn in which Jesus receives honour that Isaiah gives to YHWH.
Matthew 11:27
All things have been entrusted to Me by My Father. No one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Father except the Son and those to whom the Son chooses to reveal Him.

A saying shared by Matthew and Luke that claims a unique Father-Son knowledge, with a John-like tone.
Luke 1:1
Many have undertaken to compose an account of the things that have been fulfilled among us,

Luke describes compiling and ordering earlier accounts, which shows that the Gospels were edited.
Daniel 7:13
In my vision in the night I continued to watch, and I saw One like the Son of Man coming with the clouds of heaven. He approached the Ancient of Days and was led into His presence.

The background for 'Son of Man' as a heavenly figure who is given everlasting rule.

Common points of confusion

Scholars agree that the historical Jesus never claimed any special status.: There is no consensus. Many critical scholars hold that Jesus made implicit claims to unique authority (Mark 2:7-10; Mark 14:62). The disagreement is mainly about the explicit, John-style statements.
The belief that Jesus was God was invented at the Council of Nicaea in 325.: Paul's letters from the 50s already join Jesus to the one God and record prayer to him (1 Corinthians 8:6; 1 Corinthians 16:22; Philippians 2:6-11). Nicaea debated how to define a belief that already existed.
Jesus repeatedly says 'I am God' in the Gospels.: No Gospel uses those words. The claims come through phrases like 'I am,' 'Son,' 'one with the Father,' and actions such as forgiving sins, and each of these needs interpreting.
'Son of God' always meant 'divine' to first-century Jews.: The phrase was used of Israel's king (Psalm 2:7), of Israel (Exodus 4:22), and of Adam (Luke 3:38). Its meaning depends on context.
Because John differs from the Synoptics, John is simply fiction.: Even scholars who doubt the historicity of John's discourses often accept details in John's geography and chronology. The usual critical view is that John interprets Jesus theologically, not that it is invented from nothing.

Sources: Berean Standard Bible (verse quotations) · Nestle-Aland Novum Testamentum Graece, 28th ed. (Greek text) · Strong's Exhaustive Concordance (lexical numbers) · Bauer, Danker, Arndt, Gingrich, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament (BDAG) · Rudolf Bultmann, Theology of the New Testament · James D. G. Dunn, Christology in the Making · Larry W. Hurtado, Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity · Richard Bauckham, Jesus and the God of Israel · Bart D. Ehrman, How Jesus Became God · John P. Meier, A Marginal Jew (criteria of authenticity) · E. P. Sanders, The Historical Figure of Jesus

Responses

Loading…